Parmenides: Then the one which is not, if it is to maintain itself, must have the being of not-being, just as being must have as a bond the not-being of not-being in order to perfect its own being; for the truest assertion of the being of being and of the not-being of not-being is when being partakes of the being of being, and not of the being of not-being--that is, the perfection of being; and when not-being does not partake of the not-being of not-being but of the being of not-being--that is the perfection of not-being.
Socrates: Most true.
Viser 1 svar.
![[ Slettet bruker ]](/static/grafikk/fjes.gif){kind=small}
De slipper i alle fall å stå kritikk for at de ikke turde forsøke . . . ;)
Sist sett
